Skip to content
Not the Same Question All fifty notes

The costs

Who pays, and who says so

Five claims about cost, four of them never spoken aloud, and between them they decided the outcome.

Claims this part is about, and what each was answered with

The claimKindAnswered with

The travel time and fares fall entirely on the employee

Interest·Nothing; it was never said out loud

Childcare was arranged around the pattern now being changed

Interest·Nothing; it was never said out loud

Two people moved house on the basis of the previous arrangement

Interest·Nothing; it was never said out loud

The journeys of the people setting the rule are the shortest on the team

Interest·Nothing; it was never said out loud

The lease runs to 2031 and the rent review falls next year

Interest→A statement about who pays

Said once, in a finance update

Interest — about who pays, settleable only by saying so: 5→Answered in its own kind: 1·Never answered: 4

five claims · five interest · none of the answered ones was answered in the wrong kind · four were never answered at all

All five claims about who pays, from the twenty-four.

The five costs

Everything in this argument that is actually a cost, who bears each one, and the one that was mentioned.

The four that were never said

Everyone knew all four. Nobody mentioned any of them in eleven weeks. Four different reasons for the same silence.

The ledger with one side

Why an organisation's costs are written down and an individual's are not, and what that does to a decision taken on the basis of what is written down.

The lease and the culture argument

Two true things standing next to each other, and why the presence of the first makes the second impossible to state.

Naming a cost without accusing anyone

The sentence that puts a figure in the room and does not land as a complaint. Four components, and the one that most people leave out.

The cost that is not money

Fares are the smallest part of it. Four costs that do not convert into a figure, and why leaving them out understates the case.

Whose journey is shortest

The people who set the rule had the shortest journeys on the team. That is not a motive. It is a vantage point, and vantage points are correctable.

The cheapest claims to settle

No measurement to design, no values to reconcile. Just somebody saying a true thing. So why were four of five never said?

Back to all fifty